Detalles
The article describes how by complementing the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and science-based targets (SBTs), companies can actively address their impacts and quantify their contributions to nature-positive outcomes. As a complement to the CSRD, SBT empowers companies to actively address their impacts and quantify their contributions to nature-positive outcomes.
Both the CSRD and SBT can support transitions to more sustainable corporate practices. They are complementary but distinct, with the aim of achieving different results. This is explored in the article through three possible cases: Reporting disclosures, the CSRD's primary emphasis is on disclosure but it is the companies that choose the approach to assess materiality. Beyond disclosures, SBTs allow for planning for the transition of the nature of entities. Long-term value, the combination of CRSD and SBT helps companies build capacity and to adapt to emerging trends and stay ahead of future requirements.
Recursos relacionados
The thematic assessment report on interlinkages among biodiversity, water, food and health
This report by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) provides a critical assessment of the evidence…
Financing Nature: A Practitioner’s Guide to Result Metrics Selection
Esta guía ofrece un marco práctico para apoyar a los profesionales en la selección de métricas sólidas y adecuadas al…
Navigating the green shift: overcoming challenges in climate and nature transition finance
While several central banks and financial supervisors have made significant progress in addressing climate and nature-related risks and opportunities, significant…