The Green Scorpion: the Macro Criticality of Nature for Finance. Foundations for scenario-based analysis of complex and cascading physical nature-related financial risks
Detalles
| The main objective of this report is to draw on the science and economics of nature to help develop scenario approaches to nature-related financial risks needed to assess the macrocriticality of nature for financial institutions, inform action by central banks and the financial sector, and relate this to a preliminary assessment of the relative scale of risks in different countries. Different applications require different types of scenarios. For example, for the prudential regulation of central banks and supervisors, which is the main objective of this report, and in relation to the establishment of capital requirements for financial institutions, plausible but more extreme scenarios need to be explored. The document focuses on financial risks related to physical nature, i.e. those associated with physical changes in nature and the ecosystem services it generates for our societies and economies. To design a scenario-based approach, the authors take as a starting point the conceptual framework proposed by NGFS (Network for Greening Financial Systems) and the guidance on scenarios and risk assessment from the Task Force on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), learn from climate financial risk assessment, and develop a set of principles and framework for assessing the macrocriticality of related risks with nature based on science and economics. All this, supported by new research on the channels of risk transmission from nature to finance, including an analysis of more than 60 historical analogies. The result is an inventory of nearly 80 potential impacts of nature-related physical hazards that can serve as a basis for scenario development. Another innovation in this report is the shift from dependency to risk. It presents a new preliminary approach to risk detection for financial institutions, central banks and supervisors, and demonstrates how risks can be quantified for five potential risk dimensions (pollination, groundwater, surface water, air quality and water quality (pollution)). |
Recursos relacionados
How Should Financiers Align with the Global Biodiversity Framework? Five Key Principles
How should global funders align with the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF)? The following briefing note recommends that funders commit to…
Climate and Nature Risk Report 2025
Independently conducted by Censuswide in August 2025, the report surveys senior sustainability and finance executives from the US, UK and…
Discussion paper on Nature transition plans
The mission of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) is to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030, with the…