Detalles
Key findings of this document from the International Advisory Panel on Biodiversity Credits (IAPB), released at COP16 of the Convention on Biological Diversity include:
- High-integrity biodiversity credits and credit markets are feasible to develop at scale and pace. This will require the action of multiple actors, as set out in this document. In particular, governments need policy directives or regulatory mechanisms to unlock funding that benefits nature and its guardians.
- High integrity means verified outcomes for nature, fairness and justice for people, and good governance for markets. High integrity at all levels is a prerequisite for scale, not a hindrance. Confidence in high integrity at project and market level. Demand for biodiversity credits is growing and private sector organizations are increasingly understanding of their responsibilities and impacts on nature, and governments are developing and implementing policy frameworks to support or mandate actions.
- The important role of the custodians of nature is evident. Indigenous peoples and local communities, in both the Global North and the Global South, are often on the "frontline" of management. Their knowledge, experience, traditions and values are of vital importance for the maintenance, restoration and sustainable use of nature. Indigenous peoples and local communities must be co-creators of projects and markets and include in all aspects of design and implementation. Free, prior and informed consent and respect for human rights and the rights to land, water and other resources.
- A biodiversity credit is "a certificate that represents a unit of measurement and positive outcomes for biodiversity that are durable and in addition to what would have otherwise occurred" (BCA, 2024a). IAPB's work builds on this definition, including conservation and restoration outcomes, to examine some aspects in greater depth and establish the criteria needed to ensure the integrity of biodiversity credits and markets.
Recursos relacionados
Chemical sector guidance on applying the natural capital management accounting methodology
Como parte del Proyecto Transparente, este documento de orientación sectorial proporciona una descripción general y recursos adicionales en apoyo de…
Testing a nature-related risk framework in the consumer staples sector. Learnings from soy supply chains
The Global Canopy and UNEP FI report identifies the key challenges faced by companies and financial institutions when assessing, managing…
Interoperability mapping between the GRI Standards and the TNFD Recommended Disclosures and metrics
Over the past two years, the TNFD and the GRI have worked closely together to support the development of their…