Detalles
After two years of disclosure of information on Taxonomy, many questions arise about the usefulness of this information. This document aims to analyse which are the aspects that, for the time being, may limit the use of this information for decision-making in the market. In order to address these challenges, this first section describes the context in which this regulatory framework arises and its current development. In this report, EY and Clarity AI have analysed data from 1423 companies (71 Spanish and 1352 European) on how they have reported in 2023 the requirements posed by the taxonomy regulation: eligibility and alignment of the three measurement indicators: revenue, CaPex and OpEx. In addition, the data of Spanish companies are compared with those of the EU. |
Recursos relacionados
Measures to Enhance Forest Conservation and Reduce Deforestation. Viewpoints and lessons from producing countries
Forests sustain and protect us in a thousand ways, but they are disappearing rapidly. The world has lost 420 million…
Integrating biodiversity into private equity. Feedback and case studies
The integration of biodiversity issues by private capital actors is a major challenge, in response to new regulations and the…
Guidelines on Enforcement of Sustainability Information
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU's financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published the Final Report on…