Detalles
Biodiversity credits will be used to counteract negative impacts and will be integrated into business trajectories of net positive impacts on biodiversity. Therefore, it is necessary to establish rules on the ecological equivalence of biodiversity credits and starting by accounting for and counteracting impacts at ecoregion level is essential.
These are the proposals made by BioInt in its recent publication on Beyond Rhetoric: A Call for Equivalency Rules for Biodiversity Credits. It also addresses the UK's recent Biodiversity Net Gain regulation, which deals with a number of key issues relevant to biodiversity credits, but does not address supply chain impacts, thus leaving open the question of ecological equivalence for biodiversity credits used in the value chain.
Biodiversity credit has enormous potential and carries very real risks to biodiversity. We hope that our opinion piece can spark a much-needed debate on eco-equivalence standards to limit those risks.
Recursos relacionados
The Green Scorpion: the Macro Criticality of Nature for Finance. Foundations for scenario-based analysis of complex and cascading physical nature-related financial risks
The main objective of this report is to draw on the science and economics of nature to help develop scenario…
Recommendations toward the development of scenarios for assessing nature-related economic and financial risks
This document published by the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) contains the following key elements:Developing narratives to assess…
Why nature matters: Nature-related risks and opportunities for insurance underwriting
This report seeks to raise awareness of the relevance of nature-related risks and opportunities for insurers to explore how the…