Detalles
Biodiversity credits will be used to counteract negative impacts and will be integrated into business trajectories of net positive impacts on biodiversity. Therefore, it is necessary to establish rules on the ecological equivalence of biodiversity credits and starting by accounting for and counteracting impacts at ecoregion level is essential.
These are the proposals made by BioInt in its recent publication on Beyond Rhetoric: A Call for Equivalency Rules for Biodiversity Credits. It also addresses the UK's recent Biodiversity Net Gain regulation, which deals with a number of key issues relevant to biodiversity credits, but does not address supply chain impacts, thus leaving open the question of ecological equivalence for biodiversity credits used in the value chain.
Biodiversity credit has enormous potential and carries very real risks to biodiversity. We hope that our opinion piece can spark a much-needed debate on eco-equivalence standards to limit those risks.
Recursos relacionados
EUDR Regulation: A tool to combat deforestation
This document provides explanatory guidance on Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 on the marketing of deforestation-free products (EUDR). It shows a list…
SCIENCE-BASED TARGETS for NATURE Business Startup Guide – Executive Summary
The Science Based Targets Network (SBTN) publishes this initial guidance on Science Based Targets (SBTs) for nature as a first…
Note on Nature Finance Tracking Methodology
This note presents a methodology for identifying and monitoring funding to support nature, in line with the commitment of the…