Detalles
In line with the growing recognition of the importance of biodiversity for business, the demand for disclosure of biodiversity business performance is also growing. A number of biodiversity disclosure frameworks and standards, both regulatory and voluntary, have been published or are being developed.
This development is welcome, as information about an organization's biodiversity performance triggers action to continuously improve performance. However, despite significant alignment efforts between some of these outreach initiatives, it is not always apparent to most companies how they relate to each other, to what extent they overlap, and where substantial differences can be observed.
The creators of information reporting frameworks and standards attempt to address this concern by providing so-called interoperability maps or mapping tables, which provide high-level benchmarking that covers the full range of disclosure requirements.
The aim of this thematic report is to fill this gap by focusing specifically on biodiversity within the respective declassification initiatives and highlighting relevant differences and similarities.
Recursos relacionados
Finance for Biodiversity: Guide on biodiversity measurement approaches
As biodiversity loss becomes an increasingly urgent challenge, financial institutions are looking for ways to quantify the impacts and dependencies…
Unlocking Circular Economy Financing: From Vision to Action
La economía circular tiene un gran potencial para construir economías resilientes, competitivas e inclusivas al redirigir el capital hacia modelos…
Gross ecosystem product in macroeconomic modelling
Economic indicators such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) do not reflect the value of nature. For this reason, it is…