Detalles
In line with the growing recognition of the importance of biodiversity for business, the demand for disclosure of biodiversity business performance is also growing. A number of biodiversity disclosure frameworks and standards, both regulatory and voluntary, have been published or are being developed.
This development is welcome, as information about an organization's biodiversity performance triggers action to continuously improve performance. However, despite significant alignment efforts between some of these outreach initiatives, it is not always apparent to most companies how they relate to each other, to what extent they overlap, and where substantial differences can be observed.
The creators of information reporting frameworks and standards attempt to address this concern by providing so-called interoperability maps or mapping tables, which provide high-level benchmarking that covers the full range of disclosure requirements.
The aim of this thematic report is to fill this gap by focusing specifically on biodiversity within the respective declassification initiatives and highlighting relevant differences and similarities.
Recursos relacionados
Practical guide on biodiversity for SMEs in the agri-food sector
Este documento ha sido elaborado por la Plataforma Europea Business @ Biodiversity (EU B@B Platform). Se trata del primer borrador…
Large European banks’ dependency on – and exposure to – ecosystem services shows that considerable value is at risk
This study suggests that the risks associated with deforestation or pollution can later translate into financial risks for banks. It…
Discussion paper on Nature transition plans
The mission of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) is to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030, with the…