Detalles
In line with the growing recognition of the importance of biodiversity for business, the demand for disclosure of biodiversity business performance is also growing. A number of biodiversity disclosure frameworks and standards, both regulatory and voluntary, have been published or are being developed.
This development is welcome, as information about an organization's biodiversity performance triggers action to continuously improve performance. However, despite significant alignment efforts between some of these outreach initiatives, it is not always apparent to most companies how they relate to each other, to what extent they overlap, and where substantial differences can be observed.
The creators of information reporting frameworks and standards attempt to address this concern by providing so-called interoperability maps or mapping tables, which provide high-level benchmarking that covers the full range of disclosure requirements.
The aim of this thematic report is to fill this gap by focusing specifically on biodiversity within the respective declassification initiatives and highlighting relevant differences and similarities.
Recursos relacionados
Capacity, Knowledge and Learning Action Plan for the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration
The Action Plan on Skills, Knowledge and Learning is one of the main outcomes of the Working Group on Best…
Sector Sprint 2024: How to unlock nature-positive transformation in the food retail sector?
This report addresses the urgent need for nature-positive transformation in the food retail sector. Through a sectoral analysis using the…
Nature-related Financial Risks: a Conceptual Framework to guide Action by Central Banks and Supervisors
This paper aims to create a common language and scientific understanding of nature-related financial risks among members of the Network…